Skip to content

The Purifier Lab · Air

How fast does an air purifier actually clear a 200 sq ft room?

Protocol published — not yet runProtocol published 2026-06-15 · last reviewed 2026-08-08

Starting from a known elevated PM2.5 concentration, how much does a given air purifier reduce it in 5, 15, 30 and 60 minutes in a sealed 200 sq ft room — and how does that compare with the reduction its CADR rating implies?

Results

No results yet. This page publishes the protocol only.

We have written and published the method below, and we have not yet run it. There are no measurements on this page, no charts and no percentage claims, because there is nothing to report.

The protocol is published first deliberately. It means we cannot quietly amend the method once we have seen a result we did not like, and it lets anyone — including manufacturers — tell us the method is wrong before we run it. If you can see a flaw in it, tell us.

The protocol

Elevate PM2.5 in a sealed 200 sq ft room to a controlled starting concentration, run the unit under test at a stated fan speed, and log PM2.5 at fixed intervals against a natural-decay control run with no purifier operating.

Instrument

Laser optical particle counter, logging at 1-minute intervals

Model: To be stated on first published run, with serial

Calibration: Co-located against a second identical unit before and after each session; any pair diverging by more than 10% at 100 µg/m³ invalidates the session.

What is held constant

  • Same room for every run — 200 sq ft, 10 ft ceiling, approximately 57 m³.
  • Doors and windows closed and taped at the same points for every run. Under-door gap sealed with the same draught excluder.
  • Air conditioning off. Ceiling fan off. No occupant movement in the room during logging.
  • Monitor at 1 m height, 2 m from the unit, never in the direct discharge stream.
  • Starting concentration brought to 150–200 µg/m³ and allowed to stabilise for 5 minutes before logging begins.
  • Temperature and relative humidity recorded at the start and end of every run.
  • A natural-decay control run with no purifier operating is recorded in the same session, because a sealed room clears slowly by itself and that fraction must be subtracted.

Steps

  1. 1

    Seal and stabilise the room

    Close and tape the same points on every run. Seal the under-door gap. Leave the room undisturbed for 15 minutes so the air is still before anything else happens.

  2. 2

    Elevate PM2.5 to the starting band

    Introduce particulate from a consistent source until the monitor reads between 150 and 200 µg/m³, then stop and allow 5 minutes for mixing and stabilisation. The source is stated on every published run because different sources produce different particle size distributions.

  3. 3

    Record the natural decay control

    With no purifier running, log PM2.5 for 60 minutes. This is what the room does on its own through settling and infiltration, and it is subtracted from every subsequent result. Skipping this step is why most published purifier tests overstate performance.

  4. 4

    Run the unit under test

    Re-elevate to the same starting band, then start the unit at a stated fan speed. Log PM2.5 every minute for 60 minutes. Do not enter the room.

  5. 5

    Repeat at a second fan speed

    Repeat the full sequence at the unit's maximum speed and at its quietest usable speed, because the difference between them is what a household actually experiences at night.

  6. 6

    Publish everything

    Raw minute-by-minute readings, ambient conditions, fan speed, the control run, and any anomaly. A run that went wrong is published with a note explaining what went wrong, not discarded.

What this test cannot tell you

Published with the protocol rather than buried after the results. A test whose limits are not stated is a claim, not a measurement.

  • One room. Results describe this room's volume, leakage and layout, and do not transfer directly to a differently shaped or leakier space.
  • An optical particle counter infers mass concentration from light scattering, assuming a particle density and refractive index. Readings are repeatable and internally comparable, but they are not reference-grade gravimetric measurements.
  • The particulate source is not identical to ambient urban PM2.5. Particle size distribution differs, and capture efficiency varies with size.
  • A single session cannot separate filter condition from unit design. Units tested with a new filter will outperform the same unit at six months, and that is a separate test.
  • We do not measure gas-phase pollutants in this protocol at all. A unit that clears particulate quickly may leave odour entirely untouched.

Note

We are not an accredited testing laboratory and we do not present these as certified results. This is a published method, run consistently, with raw data and limitations disclosed — which is a different and more modest claim than certification, and we would rather make the modest one accurately.

Frequently asked questions

Why publish a test protocol before you have results?
Because the protocol is what makes a result meaningful, and publishing it first means we cannot quietly change it afterwards to suit an outcome. It also lets anyone check whether our method is sound before they trust a number from it — including manufacturers, who are welcome to tell us it is wrong.
Why does the protocol include a run with no purifier?
Because a sealed room clears particulate by itself, through settling and infiltration, and that fraction has nothing to do with the purifier. Most published purifier tests omit this control, which means their reduction figures include work the room did on its own. Subtracting it usually reduces the headline number considerably.
Is this the same as an AHAM CADR test?
No, and it is not intended to be. ANSI/AHAM AC-1 uses a standardised 28.5 m³ chamber under controlled conditions to produce a comparable rating. This measures what happens in one real Indian bedroom, with real leakage, at real fan speeds. The two answer different questions and the gap between them is what makes this worth running.

Related protocols

Free consultation · Pan-India

Not sure what you actually need? Ask us before you spend.

Tell us your city, your water source and your budget. For homes we will recommend the right technology — including telling you when a ₹3,000 purifier is genuinely enough. For offices, societies and factories, our team will size a system against your water report and send a specification-backed quotation.

Or email betterworkindia@gmail.com — attach a water analysis report and we can quote faster.

  • Homes

    Right-sized recommendation for your TDS, not the most expensive unit

  • Offices & societies

    25 LPH to 2,000+ LPH, sized on headcount and feed water

  • Industry

    Pharma, food, textile, boiler feed — engineered to your specification

  • Service & AMC

    Installation, repair and AMC with written response times

Pan-India installation & serviceAMC support availableFree site water-quality auditCustom-engineered to your TDSHow our quotation process works →